Mountain Motors

I can remember when a 454 was a big block, and 500 cubes was a “mountain motor.”  But with today’s head, valve spring & lifter technology there appears to be no end in sight!

SONNY LEONARD TOPS 1000 CID WITH NEW ENGINE – CompetitionPlus.com – January 26, 2011

“…This engine is capable of running 8,000 rpm which was unheard of five years ago,” Leonard explained. ‘The door is open here. It might not be as efficient but it will go quicker. If it was weight per cubic inch, this wouldn’t be the way to go…”

Posted in Discussions, Technical Discussions | Tagged | 1 Comment

NHRA’s Non-profit Status Challenged

UPDATED January 13, 2012

LETTER TO IRS QUESTIONS NHRA TAX STATUS – CompetitionPlus.com – 22 Jan 2011

Letter to IRS – 12 Jan 2011

Forbes article – 21 Jan 2011

If it walks like a duck and talks like a duck …. – Washington Examiner – 21 Jan 2011

NHRA on the IRS radar screen now By Jeff Burk – 21 Jan 2011

“No one should be surprised that someone who felt wronged by the NHRA has taken the step of making the IRS aware of the NHRA and its operation. After all, the NHRA has been run as a dictatorship for more than 50 years, answering to no one and especially not to the so-called NHRA ‘members’…”

Who actually owns the NHRA – nitromater.com

NHRA tax return 2009: The returns are in – Drag Racing Online

NHRA ADDS NEW BOARD MEMBERS – CompetitionPlus.com – December 10, 2010

About the NHRA – NHRA

A Possible Solution?

Have one NHRA Board member that is elected by, and represents the Sportsman racers on the board. And make this board member easily accessible to the membership via an e-mail link, dedicated phone number, mailing address, etc. I would also recommend that NHRA dedicate a page on their site for this elected representative to post updates, proposals, etc.

Voting would be limited to those current paid NHRA Sportsman members and be for a 3-year term. – Edwards & Young Racing – [Submitted to NHRA on 25 Jan 2011]

FEEDBACK FRIDAY – LETTER QUESTIONS NHRA TAX STATUS – CompetitionPlus.com – 29 Jan – 2011

1951 NHRA articles of incorporation, 2005 amended articles of incorporation & 2009 annual report – Edwards & Young – 2 Feb 2011

 The original articles of incorporation which were in effect until amended in 2005 stated in part: [emphasis ours]

“…That the specific and primary purpose for which said corporation is organized are as follows:

“To promote safety, sportsmanship and fellowship among hot rod enthusiasts through the organization of clubs and associations which will encourage a mutual exchange of beneficial views and sponsor educational and safety programs to the end that the hot rod sport will be better regulated and will be conducted on higher standards, resulting in its more favorable acceptance by the press and public and in greater benefits to its active participants…”

That entire clause of “mutual exhange of beneficial views” was removed in the 2005 amended articles of incorporation. In fact the 2005 articles look nothing like the founding document.

Section VI, 4 of the amended articles also states:

“The corporation has no members within the meaning of Section 5056 of the California Corporation Law.”

I’ve provided the link above for your information. – Roger Young

JOSH PETERSON PROMOTED TO NHRA VP OF RACING ADMIN. – CompetitionPlus.com – March 3, 2011

“…In addition to retaining all of his current responsibilities and becoming a member of the NHRA Competition Committee, Peterson will assume additional responsibilities with NHRA’s sportsman racing programs.  NHRA’s seven division directors will report directly to Peterson and together will work on strategic planning, member track support and other aspects of divisional racing and operations…”

Looking at NHRA’s 2010  Tax Return by Jeff Burk – January 11, 2012

We’ll be updating this post as events unfold.

 

Posted in Discussions, NHRA Increases Membership Fees, NHRA National News | Tagged | 10 Comments

What’s Happening at Pacific Raceways?

If the rumors are correct, all the track personnel that were at Pacific Raceways in 2010 are gone! What is it with Pacific that every couple of years a crew which has started to gel and has earned the respect of most of the local racers is suddenly gone to start the entire process all over again?

Could it be the ownership?  Here’s a local news story of interest that does not appear on Pacific Raceways site:

Pacific Raceways president and opponents clash over expansion of track – Covington Reporter – 26 Dec 10

In my opinion, it is time for the ownership of PR to start leveling with the local racers that support them and provide stable management that we know will be running the track from year to year! – Roger Young

Update 25 Apr 2011:  At the opening race on April 23, the reports are that most of the track personnel at PR have returned and they ran a good race under the watchful eyes of the new dragstrip manager!  That’s good news!  They were also very quick to update their website with the results, points, and even reported the results to the Seattle Times. It has been many years since such results were posted in our MSM.

Tech is now back in the staging lanes with registration nearby!  

PACIFIC RACWAYS’ DECADE OF UNKEPT PROMISES WEARING THIN – CompetitionPlus.com – August 15, 2011

‘WE CAUSED IT OURSELVES,’ HIGHT SAYS OF TIRE INCIDENT – CompetitionPlus.com – November 28, 2011

 

Posted in Discussions, News From Div 6 and/or Local Tracks, What's Your Favorite Track? | Tagged | 9 Comments

Are Burnouts Abusing Your Engine? by David Reher

Technically Speaking with David Reher – NHRA National Dragster, December 10, 2010

Are Burnouts Abusing Your Engine?

 

In my recent back-page columns, I’ve focused on the mechanical side of drag racing: cooling systems, lubrication systems, fuel systems, and ignition systems. This time I’m going to address a different topic: How a driver’s burnout technique can affect the engine and chassis.

I’m an engine builder, not a driver, but in more than 40 years in drag racing, I’ve witnessed thousands of burnouts. I’ve worked with tire engineers in extended test sessions. I’ve watched burnouts performed by championship-winning professionals and by novices at bracket races. Where I really see the effects of burnouts is in the engine shop.

How can burnouts affect engine performance and reliability? I’ve asked myself that question when two identical engines have come back to our shop for overhauls in vastly different conditions. Both engines were assembled with the same components and specifications, both produced virtually the same dyno numbers, and both had made a similar number of runs, yet one looked nearly perfect and the other was abused almost to the point of failure. In an age of electronically controlled automatic shifters and rpm limiters, how is this possible? I’ve concluded that how a drag racing engine is treated during burnouts has a lot to do with its long-term reliability.

The best procedure is a smooth, driving burnout to clean and heat the tires. It’s essential to back off the throttle before the tires bite. A driver who has a good feel for the car instinctively lets off the gas before the tires grab. If the tires suddenly hook up under power, the result is often instant, violent tire shake. This problem is aggravated by the necessity in Sportsman racing to use larger tires due to the widely varying track conditions that Sportsman drivers race under.

In a high-horsepower race car with a manual transmission, the abrupt meeting of horsepower and traction during a burnout will almost invariably knock out the carefully adjusted clutch. In an automatic-equipped race car, the telltale sign is elongated bolt holes and cracks in the flexplate. The evidence can also be seen in the chassis as cracked suspension mounts and bent framerails. The smooth application of power during a burnout won’t do that.

I don’t recommend using a stepped rpm limiter during the burnout. It’s alright to have a high-speed limiter as a backup to prevent overrevving the engine in case of a broken drivetrain or a stuck throttle. It’s not OK to put the throttle pedal on the floor and run the engine against the limiter for the duration of the burnout.

Limiters work by cutting spark to the cylinders, essentially causing continuous misfires. Many are so effective that they can control the engine speed to within a few rpm. The downside, however, is that the prolonged interruption of the cylinder firing is very hard on the engine. Instead of a steady flow of power pulses being delivered to the crankshaft, the power comes in starts and stops as cylinders are dropped and fired again. The intense vibrations that result are transmitted throughout the engine, affecting the crankshaft, the camshaft drive, and the valvetrain. The driver can’t appreciate what’s happening because the engine is usually popping, banging, and running rough when it’s on the limiter.

Operating the engine at a specific rpm imposed by an rpm limiter for an extended time during a burnout can have serious consequences if the natural frequencies of the components are in sync at that particular engine speed. I’ve learned this from my own experiences. Years ago, my late partner, Buddy Morrison, built a spin fixture to test valvetrain dynamics. It wasn’t nearly as sophisticated as today’s Spintrons, but it did the job. We had a 460-cid Ford hooked up to the test engine through a gear drive and spun the crankshaft at whatever rpm we wanted. We’d watch what the valvetrain was doing at various rpm with a 60-cycle strobe light, and sometimes what we saw was shocking.

At certain speeds, the valvtrain would be totally out of control, with the pushrods smoking and the valve springs bouncing completely off the heads and retainers. The particular rpm where these frequencies converged depended on many variables: the pushrod diameter and wall thickness, the valve spring pressure, the camshaft profile, the valve weight, the rocker arm ratio, and many other factors. It was an eye-opening demonstration of the effects of harmonics in a racing engine.

Years later, I was reminded of that experience when Bruce Allen and I were breaking in tires with our Pro Stocker on the day after a national event. We’d left our race engine in the car, thinking that a few low-rpm burnouts to scuff new sets of slicks couldn’t possibly damage it.

Well, we just about killed that engine in the span of a few seconds. When I pulled off the rocker covers after the burnouts, there was smoke rolling out of the valley. The valve springs had collapsed, the pushrods were trashed, and we were fortunate we hadn’t destroyed our best engine. Even though the engine was running far below its peak rpm, the particular engine speed that it ran during the tire break-in burnouts produced a perfect storm of valvetrain harmonics.

A racing engine that operates across a range of speeds typically doesn’t spend enough time at a specific rpm point to experience damaging harmonic vibrations. If the engine is electronically held at a prescribed rpm that excites harmonic vibrations by a rev limiter during a burnout, then the result can be internal damage. This damage is cumulative, with the parts deteriorating every time a burnout is done at the same rpm.

When we disassemble an engine and find broken valve springs, damaged pushrod and rocker arm cups, and other signs of harmonic-related distress, it points a finger at the burnout procedure. And identical engine that’s run without a burnout rev limiter may who none of these symptoms because the driver’s right foot can’t hold the rpm at a constant prescribed speed. The problem is that the engine speed where harmonics occur can’t be pinpointed – it depends on the complex interaction of all the components. Change the pushrod diameter or install a set of different valve springs, and the valvetrain dynamics will change as well.

In my experience, most of the engines that are in good condition when they come back for an overhaul have been raced by drivers who do smooth burnouts – controlled by the throttle pedal, not by a limiter – and get off the gas before the tires grab. If a racer perfects this technique, the engine will live longer and perform better. ND

David Reher is co-owner of Reher-Morrison Racing Engines. Send correspondence regarding this column to Technically Speaking, c/o Reher-Morrison Racing Engines, 1120 Enterprise Place, Arlington, TX. 76001.

=======================

Additional comment by Roger Young, Edwards & Young Racing: I absolutely agree with David Reher on this very important discussion. I learned many years ago in aircraft powerplant school that all reciprocating engines have several “criticals” throughout their operating RPM range. It was very common that tachometers in piston-powered aircraft had several red zones where you were not to operate an engine for any time period whatsoever. You had to quickly pass through those critical RPMs.

Such criticals were not limited to engine damage, especially in piston-powered helicopters. At certain RPMs if the engine was operated for any period of time it could lead to catastrophic airframe failure as the engine, main rotor system, tail rotor and airframe would reach a common harmonic that would literally shake the helicopter to pieces!

We also learned from a local racer in Top Sportsman that his large-displacement engine suffered significant engine damage which was attributed to doing burnouts on the rev limiter at wide open throttle. After only a few runs the engine had lifter, cam lobe and bearing damage which a leading engine builder attributed to his burnout procedure.

With our ’57, I do our burnout in 3rd gear. If I continue the burnout until the tires stick it overheats the sintered-iron clutch and will likely turn the tires hard on the starting line because the clutch hits harder on the launch.

For many more technical articles, see our “Tech Tips” section on Edwards & Young Racing

I thank David Reher for once again educating all of us. – Roger Young

Posted in Discussions, Technical Discussions | 4 Comments

End Of An Era

ED MCCULLOCH PLANS TO RETIRE FROM DRAG RACING – Competition Plus.com – November 20, 2010

RON CAPPS: THE INSIDE TRUTH – Competition Plus.com – December 6, 2010

Veteran driver and crew chief McCulloch retires with honors – NHRA – February 7, 2011

“…For five and a half years, Don treated me good, and I have nothing bad to say about him. I’ve never worked for a better guy as far as letting you go and do what you need to do, but Don plays hard ball. I thoroughly understand the pressure and expectation in the world of drag racing today. The sponsors pay the money, they’re sold a program that they’re going to win the championship, and anything short of that, it’s, ‘What’s going on?’ The expectations are high. Back when I started, money was never the motivating issue; we did it because we loved it. Now it’s all about money, whether it’s the owner or the driver. Now, the vast majority of drivers have to bring money to get the ride. It’s just a direction that I don’t agree with. I understand it, but don’t like it…”

COIL FIGURED NOW WAS THE TIME TO LEAVE – Competition Plus.com – November 18, 2010

Edwards & Young comment:  Two great legends in the sport are retiring and we wish them the very best!

Posted in Discussions | Comments Off on End Of An Era

Jim Rockstad Remembers: Seattle’s 64 Funny Cars

Excellent series, courtesy of Competitionplus.com

Part 1 – Part 2 – Part 3 – Part4 – Part 5

64 Funny Cars, Courtesy of CompetitionPlus.com

Posted in Discussions, Links To Feature Stories | 4 Comments

What’s New For 2011?

’57 Chev:

The biggest problem for racing the ’57 is me, the driver! I’m still recovering from a disc problem in my lower back which causes severe pain in my right leg. If we get that resolved prior to the 2011 season, the ’57 will be back on the track. Just general maintenance, no big changes for the car and I was very pleased with the 10.602 we ran in 2010 at Pacific Raceways!.

‘71 Chevelle:

No big changes for the Chevelle. Chris was very happy with the performance and consistency of the car during the 2010 season. We’ll replace the valve springs and just general maintenance.

‘66 Tempest:

Chris wants to change the old rear control arms that have worn bushings over the winter. We hope this will make the 60-foot times more consistent.

Let us know what plans/updates you have for 2011!

Edwards & Young Racing

Feb 7 2011: We have the new valve springs, cap, rotor & plug wires installed in the Chevelle. New rear control arms and bracing installed in the Pontiac waiting for the Spring races!

Feb 19 2011: We have our one rocker arm back from Crower for our ’57 that needed the trunion bearings replaced. Outstanding service by Crower !

Posted in Discussions | Comments Off on What’s New For 2011?

Memories of Modified: The Rise and Fall of Modified Eliminator

Finally, NHRA ran a feature story in the August 20, 2010 National Dragster on Modified Production entitled, “Memories of Modified: The Rise and Fall of Modified Eliminator” by Kevin McKenna. They also finally indicated that many Pro Stock drivers indeed started in Modified such as Butch Leal, “Dyno Don” Nicolson, Bob Riffle, Dick Landy, Herb McCanless, Tony Christian, Bruce Allen, Lee Shepherd, Warren Johnson & Mike Edwards. Since 1981, when the class was eliminated, NHRA has insisted that Pro Stock evolved from Super Stock which was not exactly the case since many of the Modified classes were folded into Super Stock after 1981. Finally, history has been corrected.  They cited that expense was the main cause for the dwindling car counts which is true [see below].  However they accept no responsibility that the rule changes mandated by NHRA directly drove those increased costs (wider slicks, greatly modified cylinder heads allowed, 5-speeds allowed) which significantly added to the costs of being competitive for the average racer and as speeds increased made the old shoebox obsolete due to their poor aerodynamics.

“…With so much going for it, including fan interest, and a wide variety of vehicles, the question remains: Why didn’t Modified survive? As early as 1975, there were signs that Modified might have a finite life span. A competitive Modified entry was never cheap to build or maintain because engine and chassis technology continued to progress at a rapid rate, and those unwilling or unable to bear the costs were quickly rendered uncompetitive. Ultimately, as costs continued to escalate, participation began to dwindle…” 

Our ’57 is about the only old ex-Modified car running here in the Northwest in Modified trim, 5-speed and all, and the fans love it!  The video below of our ’57 was taken in 2010, the other videos are from the 1978 NHRA Sportsnationals featuring some of the great heavy hitters in MP.  I hope you enjoy them!  It was a great class to watch and race! 

Roger Young – Edwards & Young Racing 

httpvh://youtu.be/7U1fb3uTfWY

’57 at Seattle International Raceway (now Pacific Raceway)

Edwards & Young 331 in our ’57

In March 2015, National Dragster had this to say about Cotton Perry:

“Perry and partner Jim Headrick’s Chev dominated the record books in the lower Gas and Modified Production classes. Their task was made more difficult by the lack of aftermarket parts [for their 292 inline 6]. During his career, Perry won nine national events to go along with four Division 2 championships, making him arguably the sport’s most successful six-cylinder racer.”

Read much more on Modified Eliminator: The Day the Sportsmen Fought Back – Competition Plus.com – Jan 2007

“…These racers, many of whom had raced in one particular category for more than a decade, had no say-so as their beloved class was sentenced to the proverbial chopping block. The remnants of their high-energy eliminator known simply as Modified were to be spread out among the classes that ranked above and below it in the eliminator pecking order. To diehard gearheads, the move made no sense. Those on the outside could see the direction of sportsman drag racing changing before their eyes…”

In a technical article noted engine builder David Reher wrote in February 2011 about the modern Pro Mod engine he concluded his article with the following statement:

“As a lifelong gearhead and professional engine builder, I’ve been fortunate to work on many different engines for many types of racing. Although every application has specific requirements, there are opportunities to apply knowledge gained in one area to a wide spectrum of racing. Many of the lessons I learned 40 years ago racing a small-block Chevy in Modified eliminator still apply to today’s behemouth Pro Mod engines.”

E&Y comment: In a similar move in July 2001, NHRA announced that the Pro Stock Truck category would be moved to Comp Eliminator for 2002, thus in effect, ending the days of the very popular small-block, gear-jamming, trucks with apparently little or no prior discussion with the teams involved.

This caused much debate and angst across the racing community and negated the millions of dollars that had been invested in developing new small-blocks for the high-winding, wheel-standing Pro Stock Truck category.

NHRA could have – and should have – handled this transition with far more sensitivity in my opinion. A minimum one-year advance warning could have saved the teams a lot of cash and grief. – Roger Young

httpvh://youtu.be/Gq9_UmvE8UA

COTTON PERRY AND THE LEGEND OF THE POCKET ROCKET – CompetitionPlus.com – August 16, 2011

Jimmy Warter’s Corvette

 

 

httpvh://youtu.be/cCFd2l_DPTo

SEASON 2, LEGENDS: THE SERIES – THE LEGEND OF REHER-MORRISON-SHEPHERD – CompetitionPlus – September 1, 2015

Posted in Discussions, Links To Feature Stories, Videos | Tagged , | 4 Comments

Pro Stock Feature Stories

BACK PAIN NEARLY FORCED PRO STOCK’S EDWARDS FROM DRIVING – CompetitionPlus – February 9, 2012

COUGHLIN PRIMED AND READY FOR PRO STOCK RETURN – CompetitionPlus – February 9, 2012

PROGRESS AND PREPARATION DOMINATE LINE/ANDERSON OFFSEASON – CompetitionPlus – January 9, 2012

GREG ANDERSON: HAGEN WAS A CHAMPION WAITING TO HAPPEN – CompetitionPlus – December 19, 2011

LINE STARTING TO EMERGE FROM ANDERSON’S SHADOW – CompetitionPlus – November 8, 2011

Four-time NHRA Pro Stock champ Coughlin to return with new Mopar – NHRA – November 1, 2011

A Kid & His Hero: Remembering Don Carlton – CompetitionPlus.com – Posted October 19, 2011

BOBBY BENNETT: IS NOW THE TIME TO CHANGE PRO STOCK? – CompetitionPlus.com – February 22, 2011

A WARREN JOHNSON PRO STOCK TRIBUTE – CompetitionPlus.com – February 11, 2011

ALLEN JOHNSON CRACKS 6.50 BARRIER – CompetitionPlus.com – February 8, 2011

PRO STOCK’S AJ FIRED UP OVER 2010 SHORTCOMINGS – CompetitionPlus.com – January 25, 2011 

KJ CONTINUES CLIMBING THE HILL – Competition Plus.com – December 20, 2010

An Interview With Larry Morgan – Competition Plus.com – December 14, 2010

LARRY MORGAN: SOMEHOW WE ARE SURVIVING – Competition Plus.com – Aug 18, 2010

PRO STOCK’S OLD MASTER – WJ JUST KEEPS ROLLIN’ ALONG – Competition Plus.com – July 27, 2010

The Tijjuana Taxi: Under Construction – Competition Plus.com – February 8, 2010

“…Before Roush became one of the most successful team owners in NASCAR, he worked as an engineer with partner Wayne Gapp in the early 1970s in the NHRA, IHRA and AHRA. The duo competed under the name Gapp and Roush and one of their cars that Gapp drove was ‘The Tijuana Taxi’…”

Butch Leal: Racing Went By In A Flash – Competition Plus.com – December 30, 2009

Leal admits that he’s reached a point in his life where he can make a good spectator and the urge to drive doesn’t have the same hold on him that it used to.

“I guess I’ve done got too old to drive,” he said.

AN AMERICAN LONGSHOT – THE AMC FACTORY PRO STOCK EFFORT – CompetitionPlus.com – November 2007

How Booth and Maskin built a Pro Stock operation from scratch

===================

From Texas, Lee Shepherd earned notariety in the Modified Production ranks and later teamed with Reher-Morrison to dominate the Pro Stock ranks.  Many small-block Chev record-holding MP cars used Shepherd heads!  Shepherd became a legend in his own time…

The Legend of Lee Shepherd – Competition Plus.com – Jan 2007

Posted in Pro Stock News | 1 Comment

Sand Traps & Safety Nets

OBERHOFER: DON’T JUST FIX THE CARS … FIX THE TRAPS! – Competition Plus.com – July 20, 2010 

GRAHAM LIGHT DISCUSSES SAND TRAPS, NETS – Competition Plus.com – July 20, 2010

Posted in Discussions, NHRA National News | Comments Off on Sand Traps & Safety Nets

2010 NHRA Northwest Nationals

John Force getting back in gear at NHRA Northwest Nationals – Seattle Times – July 8, 2010

Updated: Pro Stock Drivers and NHRA Stage “Mexican Standoff” – Competition Plus.com – July 11, 2010

Angry Pro Stock Drivers React To Seattle Incident  – Competition Plus.com – July 11, 2010 

TAD RACER MARK NIVER FATALLY INJURED – Competition Plus.com – July 11, 2010

NHRA driver Mark Niver dies in crash at Pacific Raceways – Seattle Times – July 11, 2010

NHRA driver Mark Niver dies from severe head, neck, torso injuries – Seattle Times – July 12, 2010

Northwest Nationals Results – NHRA – July 11, 2010

 

BOBBY BENNETT: IT’S TIME FOR ALL 1000 – Competition Plus.com – July 13, 2010

“…As for Pro Stock running to the 1,000 foot, the Seattle debacle wouldn’t have happened if everyone was running to the 1000, especially since the NHRA hasn’t dropped the hammer on decrepit facilities the likes of Firebird [Phoenix] and Pacific Raceways [Seattle]. I honestly don’t believe the issue at Seattle was anything less than an asphalt issue…”

My personal comment:  Decrepit?  I think that is a bit harsh, in fact it flat pisses me off!  Unless a track is lazer flat and repaved every couple of years these professionals always blame the tracks for the problems.  Is Bennett providing cover for the NHRA?  The fact is, on Friday & Saturday when the tracked was sprayed to the 1320 there was no problem in the Pro Stock class. When it wasn’t for the first round of eliminations there was a big problem! After the track prep was corrected the Pro Stock cars got down the track in fine fashion!

As to shortening the track to 1000-feet, that perhaps is going to be the reality to spare more lives.   And the fact remains that PR has one of the longest shutdown areas on the circuit and that didn’t spare the tragic loss of life of Mike Niver… – Roger Young

UPDATED: NHRA LOOKING TO MANDATE CHANGES IN TAF & TAD RANKS – Competition Plus.com – July 15, 2010

LIKE PHOENIX, SEATTLE PS QUESTIONS MAY NEVER BE ANSWERED – Competition Plus.com – July 16, 2010 

OBERHOFER: DON’T JUST FIX THE CARS … FIX THE TRAPS! – Competition Plus.com – July 20, 2010 

GRAHAM LIGHT DISCUSSES SAND TRAPS, NETS – Competition Plus.com – July 20, 2010

Posted in Discussions, News From Div 6 and/or Local Tracks, NHRA National News, Pro Stock News | 6 Comments

Will NHRA Return to 1320?

1,000-FOOT DEBATE RAGES ON – CompetitionPlus.com – February 17, 2011

MCCULLOCH: NHRA TRYING TO FIX SOMETHING NOT BROKEN – Competition Plus.com –  May 25, 2010

Proposed Fuel Pump Change Has The Nitro Pits Buzzing – Competition Plus.com – May 3, 2010

Read more:  NHRA Nitro Spec Engine

BOBBY BENNETT: IT’S TIME FOR ALL 1000 – Competition Plus.com – July 13, 2010

“…As for Pro Stock running to the 1,000 foot, the Seattle debacle wouldn’t have happened if everyone was running to the 1000, especially since the NHRA hasn’t dropped the hammer on decrepit facilities the likes of Firebird [Phoenix] and Pacific Raceways [Seattle]. I honestly don’t believe the issue at Seattle was anything less than an asphalt issue…”

My personal comment:  Decrepit?  I think that is a bit harsh, in fact it flat pisses me off!  Unless a track is lazer flat and repaved every couple of years these professionals always blame the tracks for the problems.  Is Bennett providing cover for the NHRA?  The fact is, on Friday & Saturday when the tracked was sprayed to the 1320 there was no problem in the Pro Stock class. When it wasn’t for the first round of eliminations there was a big problem! After the track prep was corrected the Pro Stock cars got down the track in fine fashion!

As to shortening the track to 1000-feet, that perhaps is going to be the reality to spare more lives.   And the fact remains that PR has one of the longest shutdown areas on the circuit and that didn’t spare the tragic loss of life of Mike Niver… – Roger Young 

Posted in Discussions, Technical Discussions | Comments Off on Will NHRA Return to 1320?