Pacific Raceway’s Upgrades Update

Seattle Refurbishment Years Away Torco Racing Fuel’s Competition Plus.com – July 20, 2009

Posted in Discussions, News From Div 6 and/or Local Tracks, Uncategorized | 2 Comments

NHRA Increases Membership Fees

Update 1 July 2009:

Well sports fans, the other shoe has dropped !  Last year to renew my competition number it was $25.  This year it is $50 for one year.  Couple that with the membership fee of $69 – required for a competition number – it now costs $119 annually to have a NHRA competition number. Few of you probably remember the days when a NHRA competition number was a minimal fee, with no membership required !

Sorry, but I just don’t believe the NHRA is subsidizing the Sportsman racer to keep our local bracket racing program going. In fact I believe it is the Sportsman racer that is keeping NHRA afloat through these tough economic times!
 
Roger Young

18 Mar 2009: I just got my NHRA membership renewal, and those fees have increased from $64 in 2008, to $69 today.

So much for NHRA holding down the costs to their members. While five bucks doesn’t sound like much, it is over a 7% increase for being allowed to be a member of NHRA.  Multiply that by the thousands of members across the nation and that is a significant amount of revenue to NHRA, provided their membership hasn’t been shrinking.

Your thoughts?

Roger Young

NHRA announces changes to competition fees NHRA – 8 Apr 09
We attempted to warn you on March 18th, now its official, they are raising fees across the board! – Roger Young

Reply from NHRA:

27 Apr 09

We appreciate your email and acknowledge your disappointment in the recent announcement. NHRA has seen a dramatic increase in legal costs, insurance costs, and operational costs over the last decade, yet most of these fees have not been raised in more than a decade. NHRA has made every effort to keep fees flat, despite these rising costs. Because of our commitment to sportsman racing, NHRA has funded these rising costs all these years but must pass a portion of these costs on to the sportsman racers.

We assure you that it was a very difficult decision to raise these fees. In most cases, it represents a $60 annual increase for an individual racer. When amortized over the length of an average schedule, the increase only equates to a few dollars more per event. We understand the economic times we are in as it has a direct impact on all areas of NHRA’s business and, as a result, led to the need to increase fees. These increases will assist us in being able to continue to provide premier racing programs at the national, divisional and local level. In addition, the recent profitability of the organization will allow NHRA to weather the economy we are currently faced with.

Again, we appreciate your note and wanted you to know that it was read and acknowledged.

Jerry Archambeault

NHRA

Related articles:

Up Front: The Mess That Is The National Hot Rod Association by Jon Asher – Torco Racing Fuel’s Competition Plus.com – August 24, 2009

“…Despite a very obvious decline in Sportsman entries at the national events as well as some Lucas Oil points meets, the NHRA further endeared themselves to their base by announcing an increase in fees for those classes in early April of this year.  That produced a firestorm of anger, which was dutifully reported by this and other publications – and completely ignored by the NHRA.  It would have been humorous had the increases not been so ill-conceived and poorly timed.  It was as if the organization was saying, ‘We giveth with the right hand, and taketh away with the left.’  In other words, we’ll provide some discount tickets to the national events (which we applaud the organization for having done), but make up for those losses by forcing our most loyal customers to make up the difference.  If anyone doubts that, despite public pronouncements to the contrary, NHRA’s management doesn’t sometimes operate under the unspoken concept of ‘We can do anything we want to the Sportsman because they’re not only powerless, they’ll do anything to race,’ you simply haven’t been paying attention.  Some Sportsman are fighting back the only way they can – be declining to enter NHRA national events…”

Posted in NHRA Increases Membership Fees | 15 Comments

NHRA Nitro ‘Spec’ Engine?

Mandating another nitro ‘spec’ engine is a mistake! by Jeff Burk – Posted May 5, 2009

Personal comment: I have mixed emotions about this new ‘spec’ engine being the answer. Burk is absolutely correct that the nitro cars must be quicker and faster than the alcohol cars or interest will dramatically wain. On the other side of the equation, insurance costs are driving up the fees to all competitors in NHRA not only because of the accidents in the fuel ranks, but in other categories that seemingly will never see a MPH restriction imposed by NHRA. Something must change!

Roger Young

Related articlesNHRA Increases Membership Fees

 NHRA Spec Testing UpdateTorco Racing Fuel’s Competition Plus.com – May 29, 2009

 NHRA competition, tech departments conduct test with help from Cruz Pedregon RacingNHRA – November 4, 2009

 Proposed Fuel Pump Change Has The Nitro Pits Buzzing Competition Plus.com – May 3, 2010

Posted in Discussions, NHRA National News | 6 Comments

The Rumor Mill

13 Feb 2009: We recently heard a rumor that one of our local tracks was not going to provide payouts at bracket races. However, after contacting the track they have indicated this is false.

I suggest before racers & fans start posting rumors all over the internet and various blogs, that they check with the SOURCE beforehand!

The internet can be a great source of information, however it is often abused by people with their own personal agendas or bias!  False rumors only hurt our sport and increase anxiety. I think we have enough anxiety dealing with the facts and what we hear everyday in the news!

Roger Young – Edwards & Young Racing

Related article

 Shirley Says: A New Column By Shirley Muldowney Competition Plus.com – April 24, 2009

“…What I have to admit I hate about the ‘Net is how easy it is to spread falsehoods about someone. Just because someone has a blog doesn’t mean what they’re writing is the truth. The same goes for some of the sites that are devoted to drag racing. Stories that I’ve seen called ‘news’ sometimes don’t even qualify as rumors, but by the time everyone figures that out the damage is done…”

Posted in The Rumor Mill | Comments Off on The Rumor Mill

Government backed auto warranties?

How the government will back auto warranties MSNBC – 31 Mar 09

“…Many consumers — reasonably enough — say they wouldn’t buy a car from a bankrupt automaker. So the government has taken steps to ensure that the buyers of GM and Chrysler cars won’t be left out in the cold…”

 U.S. plans key role in naming GM boardMSNBC – 1 Apr 09

 How GM Crushed SaturnNewsweek – Posted 7 Apr 09

 Chrysler files for bankruptcy protectionMSNBC – 30 Apr 09

  Restructured GM to build more cars overseasMSNBC/The Washington Post – 8 May 09 

  The Harsh Realities Of Detroit’s BankruptcyTorco Racing Fuel’s Competition Plus.com – May 26, 2009

Edwards & Young comment:  Apparently President Obama is clueless on how the auto industry is structured. If Chrysler and GM actually collapse, those who manufacturer the OEM parts needed for warranty work and recalls will go with them. Not to mention the dealerships that do such work.

I’m very concerned when our government starts dictating how private industry should run. After all, does our government function in an efficient manner?  HARDLY!

Perhaps President Obama is going to get into his coveralls and fix your car personally, but I wouldn’t count on it!

Your thoughts?

Roger Young

Posted in Obama Mr. Goodwrench? | 4 Comments

What Is Your Favorite NHRA Pro Category?

My personal NHRA favorite is Pro Stock because it evolved from the Modified Production ranks and several current drivers competed in Modified Eliminator years back.

NHRA claims that Pro Stock evolved from the Super Stock ranks which is partially true because Modified Eliminator was folded into the Super Stock & Comp Eliminator categories after 1981. [See: The Day the Sportsmen Fought Back ]

What’s your favorite category? (You can also include both Pro & Sportman)

Roger

Posted in What is your favorite NHRA Pro Category? | 2 Comments

What’s Your Favorite Track?

I’ve always liked Mission Raceways, B.C., because of the hospitality and probably due to the fact our ’57 ran its quickest run of 10.54 @ 126.840 mph.  The tech inspection has always been tougher at Mission. Our ’57 also made it to the final round (runner-up) at the Langley Loafers race in 2001.

Chris prefers Bremerton Raceways where the traction is very consistent. The Handlers run a good program! He had a runner-up finish with our ’71 Chevelle at the National Open in 2006 in Super Pro.

Final Round at Bremerton

Rich Carlson photo – Final round at Bremerton

Pacific Raceways is our home track and has always had the greatest potential if under good management.  The track prep can vary depending on track personnel.

What’s your favorite track?

Roger

Posted in What's Your Favorite Track? | 4 Comments

What Was Your First Ride?

What was the first car you owned?  Mine was a ’58 Chev Biscayne, 2-door.

It had a 235-Chev 6 with a 3-speed overdrive with 4:11 posi rear end.  I installed forged pistons, a Melling 3/4 race cam, Offenhauser intake with twin single barrel Rochester carbs, and installed headers from Sears that went into a split V-8 exhaust. 

I have to admit I blew up a few of those fragile 3-speeds!

I bought the car in 1965 when I was in high school.

Roger 

Posted in What Was Your First Ride? | 11 Comments